{"id":1383,"date":"2026-09-27T05:54:00","date_gmt":"2026-09-27T02:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/miglioricasinocrypto.com\/casino-online\/"},"modified":"2026-09-27T05:54:00","modified_gmt":"2026-09-27T02:54:00","slug":"casino-online","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/miglioricasinocrypto.com\/en\/casino-online\/","title":{"rendered":"Online casinos: how a score out of ten points is built"},"content":{"rendered":"

The phrase casino online gets 60,500 searches a month (Keyword Planner, Italy, 27.09.2026). On this site an online casino does not get a score because we liked it, but because we found enough documents to read. The library contains one hundred operator records, closed on 26 August 2026 with a single record updated on 2 September. Of those hundred, forty-seven receive a number out of ten and fifty-three are left without a score. This page explains how the number is put together, which boxes raise it, which lower it and why, for more than half the online casinos in the library, silence is the most correct answer we can give.<\/p>\n

What we actually read about each online casino<\/h2>\n

Every record notes how it was obtained. For thirty-eight operators the pages were read live, for forty-one from a saved copy of the same pages, and for twenty-one nothing could be read. This last group is important: twenty-one records out of a hundred are empty, and they stay empty even if those brands have active sites and full shop windows. Not having read is not the same as a negative judgement, it is the same as having nothing to say.<\/p>\n

The fields a record can contain are six: the licence number with the register, the status and the holding company; the list of countries the operator declares it does not serve; the summary of the clause on document verification, with the clause number where there is one; any withdrawal cap with the period; the list of accepted currencies; the list of game studios. Any other quantity found in the reviews going around \u2014 payment speed, average RTP, generosity of bonuses \u2014 is not in our files, and so it does not end up in our pages.<\/p>\n

It is worth noting how little filled in these six rows are overall. Out of a hundred online casinos, forty-nine have a legible verification clause, thirty-eight a list of refused countries, thirty-three a list of studios, thirty a list of currencies, fourteen a withdrawal cap and sixty-eight a licence number. No row reaches seventy. Anyone presenting a table with a hundred rows all filled in is filling the boxes with something they have not read, and the difference between the two cannot be seen from the outside: it can be seen only if next to every number there is the source.<\/p>\n

Seven components, ten points<\/h2>\n

The score is a sum, not an impression. Every component has a fixed weight and a precise source.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Component<\/th>\nMaximum points<\/th>\nWhat it reads<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Licence number<\/td>\n2,5<\/td>\npresence and status of the number in a consultable register<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clarity of verification<\/td>\n2,0<\/td>\na citable clause, and whether it states a figure<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
List of refused countries published<\/td>\n1,5<\/td>\nthe existence of the list, not its length<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Currencies accepted<\/td>\n1,5<\/td>\nhow many currencies the operator declares it settles in<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Breadth of coverage<\/td>\n1,5<\/td>\nhow little the list of refusals takes away<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
No verification imposed at opening<\/td>\n1,0<\/td>\nwhether the clause reserves the check from the start<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
List of providers<\/td>\n1,0<\/td>\ndeclared, not counted at present<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The weights column already says something about our method: two components out of seven, for four and a half points out of ten, concern identity and licence documents, and none concerns entertainment. An online casino with a thousand games and an unconfirmed licence number takes fewer points than an online casino with forty games and a verifiable number, because our formula measures the predictability of the relationship, not the richness of the shop window.<\/p>\n

The denominator: why fifty-three online casinos are left without a score<\/h2>\n

An average can be calculated on anything, even on a single filled box. We have chosen not to do that. At least three legible components are needed and a licence number that is neither absent nor zeroed; below that threshold the record exists but the score does not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Legible components<\/th>\nHow many operators<\/th>\nScore<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
6<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n16 with a score, 1 without<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n15 with a score, 1 without<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n8 with a score, 1 without<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n8 with a score, 1 without<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n4<\/td>\nno score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\n19<\/td>\nno score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
0<\/td>\n26<\/td>\nno score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The four exceptions in the right-hand column deserve a line of their own, because they show that the number of components is not enough. Bets.io has six legible components, but its number OGL\/2024\/1178\/0479 shows as revoked in the register: the main component is worth zero and the score is not issued. Mega Dice, Nitrobetting and BetPlays have three, five and four components respectively, but for them we did not read any licence number. A score built by skipping the heaviest box would be a score that hides its own gap.<\/p>\n

Twenty-six online casinos out of a hundred have zero legible components. They are the twenty-one records for which nothing could be read, plus five records in which the only information found produces no points. Nineteen have just one, typically the licence number alone. Among these two groups there are big, well-known names, and that is the point: the fame of an online casino and the amount of documents it publishes are independent quantities. A much-cited brand can turn out, in our files, to be an almost blank page.<\/p>\n

The seven that go above eight, and with what numbers<\/h2>\n

Among the forty-seven operators with a score, the mean is 6.06, the median 6.5, the minimum 3.3 and the maximum 8.5. Seven go above eight, all with six legible components out of six countable ones.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Operator<\/th>\nScore<\/th>\nCurrencies<\/th>\nRefused countries<\/th>\nLicence number<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
DuckDice<\/td>\n8,5<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n16<\/td>\nALSI-202509013-FI1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cloudbet<\/td>\n8,5<\/td>\n40<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nOGL\/2024\/328\/0599<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rainbet<\/td>\n8,4<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n11<\/td>\nALSI-152406029-FI2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wild Fortune<\/td>\n8,3<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n47<\/td>\nALSI-202509073-FI2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Windice<\/td>\n8,1<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n9<\/td>\nALSI-202411018-FI1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Shuffle<\/td>\n8,0<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n15<\/td>\nOGL\/2024\/1337\/0628<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rakebit<\/td>\n8,0<\/td>\n15<\/td>\n13<\/td>\nALSI-202602030-FI2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Look at the two rows at the top. Cloudbet reaches 8.5 by settling forty currencies and refusing two countries; DuckDice reaches the same score by settling ten and refusing sixteen. Two different routes, the same total. It is the normal behaviour of a sum of components, and it serves as a reminder that an identical score does not mean two identical sites: it means two equal sums made with different addends. Anyone who wants the complete ranking will find it in the page on the best online casinos<\/a>, where the rows are ordered and every component is set out.<\/p>\n

Where the most points are lost: the register<\/h2>\n

The heaviest component is also the one that separates most sharply. Fifty-six operators take the maximum of 2.5 points, that is, they have a number confirmed in the register where it appears. Seven take 0.8 points: they declare a licence that we were unable to confirm in the register, like Rocketpot with its Cura\u00e7ao indication and Wolf.bet with its Anjouan one. Five take zero, because the number shows as revoked: BC.Game (OGL\/2023\/118\/0060), Bets.io (OGL\/2024\/1178\/0479), Betriot, Casinoly and Zet Casino, these last three on the same number OGL\/2023\/103\/0067 in the name of Rabidi N.V. For thirty-two operators the component is empty, because no number was read.<\/p>\n

There is also an intermediate situation that does not produce a different score but changes the reading. Thirty-nine brands out of a hundred appear in the Anjouan register with a valid licence; for seven of them there is in parallel an active entry in the Cura\u00e7ao register, with a different number and a different holding company. BC.Game, for example, has a revoked number in one register and a valid one in the other, in the name of Twocent Technology Limited with a declared expiry of 1 October 2026. We do not choose which of the two entries is the real one: we record that there are two and that they do not match.<\/p>\n

Twenty years of changing trade names make this point less abstract than it seems. The reason a brand reappears with another address is told in the page on why casinos change domain<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Coverage, measured the other way round<\/h2>\n

Thirty-eight operators out of a hundred publish the list of countries they declare they do not serve. Publishing it is worth a point and a half, always the same, whether it is long or short: we prefer a list of two hundred entries to no list at all. Length, on the other hand, goes into a second component and works the other way round, because it measures how much actually remains covered.<\/p>\n

The extremes are instructive. Oshi Casino lists two hundred and twenty-four countries and on that component takes 0.2 points out of 1.5. Cloudbet lists two and takes the maximum. The median of the lists is thirty-two entries. Four operators list only one: Bitcasino.io names Japan, Bitsler American Samoa, Coins.Game the Netherlands, Stake the United States.<\/p>\n

For the Italian market the count is one line: among the thirty-eight published lists, the IT code appears only once, in Crashino’s list. Thirty-seven lists out of thirty-eight do not name it. It is a figure about the documents read in August 2026, not a forecast: the lists are rewritten without notice and need to be re-checked.<\/p>\n

A note on the more recent records, because it is the point where this component behaves worst. A brand that has appeared recently often has a licence number already legible and everything else still empty: no list of countries, no cap, no list of currencies. It therefore takes few points not because of how it treats customers, but because it has published fewer pages. The distinction between \u00ablittle documented\u00bb and \u00abbadly documented\u00bb is the heart of the page on new online casinos<\/a>, and it is worth keeping in mind every time a newly opened online casino appears at the bottom of a ranking.<\/p>\n

What an online casino's score does not contain<\/h2>\n

Three quantities that many comparisons put on the front page do not appear in our sum, and the reason is the same: we have not read them in a verifiable way across a hundred records.<\/p>\n