On a licensed gaming account the balance is denominated in euros, from start to finish. The money goes in in euros, sits in euros, comes out in euros: there is no currency step anywhere.
With a foreign operator that accepts cryptocurrencies the route is different, and the difference is not one of convenience: it is one of the number of steps. Between the euro in the current account and the euro that comes back to the current account there are at least two conversions and two network transfers, and each of the four has a cost of its own.
How many conversions are needed depends on the coin you start with: Bitcoin adds one on price, and the brands that accept it are in best Bitcoin casinos in Italy. Which software that balance then runs on is another matter, counted in the providers declared by 33 brands. The full comparison is in migliori casinò Bitcoin.
The four steps a euro takes before becoming a euro again
The first step is the purchase: euros against coin on an exchange platform. Here you pay the platform’s fee and, separately, the gap between the buying price and the selling price, which is a cost even when nobody calls it a fee.
The second is the transfer to the operator: a network transfer, with the fee that network is charging at that moment. It does not depend on the operator and it is not negotiable.
The third is the wait: as long as the balance stays with the operator, it is denominated in the coin, not in euros. If the coin falls, the balance falls, even without having played a single hand. Stable-value coins exist precisely to take this step out of the count.
The fourth is the return: withdrawal over the network, a second network fee, then selling back on the exchange platform, a second fee and a second spread.
Four steps with a cost, against zero steps with a cost on the licensed side.
Which coins the brands read really declare
First deposit with 150% more
The casino adds 150% up to 1.5 BTC on the first deposit in cryptocurrency and throws in 100 free spins. The next three deposits are worth 100%, 50% and 25%.
Activate the 100 free spinsOf the hundred brands in the library, read on 26 August 2026, only 30 publish a list of accepted coins legible enough to be recorded. Across those 30 the distribution is this:
| Coin | Brands out of 30 |
|---|---|
| Bitcoin (BTC) | 29 |
| Ethereum (ETH) | 28 |
| Litecoin (LTC) | 23 |
| Tether (USDT) | 23 |
| Dogecoin (DOGE) | 18 |
| BNB | 15 |
| XRP | 15 |
| Bitcoin Cash (BCH) | 14 |
| TRON (TRX) | 14 |
| Solana (SOL) | 13 |
| USD Coin (USDC) | 13 |
| Cardano (ADA) | 11 |
For the other 70 brands the field is empty, and empty here means that the list was not read: not that those brands accept fewer coins.
The figure that reads best is the ratio between the first and the fourth row. Bitcoin appears in 29 cases out of 30 and remains the entry standard; but Litecoin and Tether together already cover two thirds of the same group, and they are the coins chosen by those who look at the network fee before the prestige of the name.
Why the network weighs more than the declared minimum deposit
The minimum deposit is the number operators put in the shop window. The network fee is the number that decides whether that deposit makes sense, and it does not belong to the operator: it belongs to the network chosen at the moment of sending.
No fee figure is stated on this page, because it varies from hour to hour and the library does not record it. The calculation that counts can be done without tables anyway: the fee should be read as a percentage of the sum sent, not as an absolute amount. The same fee is negligible on a large transfer and prohibitive on a small one.
From this follows a counter-intuitive consequence: splitting transfers costs more, because each fraction pays its own fee in full.
What happens when the balance exceeds the operator’s cap
Fourteen brands out of a hundred publish a withdrawal cap with the number of the contractual clause. The two ends of the range say on their own how little standardised the matter is: Oshi Casino states 4000 € a day at clause 12 and Instant Casino the same figure at clause 8.1, while CoinCasino states 500,000 € a month at clause 9.6 and Bitcasino.io 1,000,000 USDT a week at clause 6.10.
On the money's route the cap has a precise effect: a balance that exceeds it does not come out in one movement, it comes out in several. And every extra movement is one more network transfer, with its own fee.
The cap, that is, does not only limit the sum. It multiplies the number of times you pay to take it away.
What can be reversed and what cannot
A payment by card or bank transfer passes through an intermediary, and the intermediary has a dispute procedure: there is someone to turn to and a written rule about what happens next.
A blockchain transfer, once confirmed, cannot be reversed by anyone. There is no intermediary that can cancel it, and this applies equally to a typing error in the address and to the wrong network chosen from the drop-down menu. In most wrong-network cases the funds are not recoverable, and no customer support can step in, because there is nothing to step in on.
It is the only difference between the two tracks that does not depend on anyone’s rules: it depends on how the two infrastructures are built.
What has not been verified
The fees of the exchange platforms, those of the networks and the confirmation times are not part of the library and are not claimed here. The library records what operators write in their own documents: accepted coins, caps, verification clauses.
Who asked for those documents from which body is the subject of the page on the ADM concession; the moment at which the operator asks you for the documents is instead in the page on registration and tax code.