When you compare five casinos you take it for granted that you have five counterparties in front of you. In the documents read on 26 August 2026 this is the assumption that holds up least of all.
Two multiplications work in opposite directions. On the one hand a single brand presents itself at several addresses; on the other several brands sit behind a single registration. In between, whoever is comparing counts shop windows and believes they are counting companies.
If behind five brands there is a single company, behind a complaint there is a single interlocutor: the matter is taken up in who to turn to when the operator is not ADM. The same happens with the software, where a few studios cover almost every lobby: the providers declared by 33 brands. The full comparison is in best crypto casinos in Italy.
Eight brands that appear on the list only with back-up domains
In the comparison between the 82 brands in the table on the home page and the list of gambling domains without an Italian concession — 12,638 entries as at 21 August 2026 — eight brands produced a particular result: the main domain did not appear, but other addresses of the same brand were on the list.
| Brand | Back-up domains present on the list | Example |
|---|---|---|
| VegaZone | 13 | vegazone1.com |
| NovaJackpot | 5 | novajackpot3.com |
| Casinoly | 4 | casinoly1.com |
| SlotsGem | 1 | slotsgem1.com |
| Winz.io | 1 | winz1.io |
| Mirax | 1 | miraxcasino1.com |
| El Royale | 1 | my.elroyalecasino.com |
| Vipbet | 1 | vipbet365.net |
24 addresses in all for eight brands. Thirteen belong to a single brand, which means that that brand has already changed address more times than appear in the rankings that cite it.
The numbering of the back-up addresses tells the same story without needing to be interpreted: when an address ends with a running number, the number is the count of the moves.
What a list of 12,638 entries really records
First deposit with 150% more
The casino adds 150% up to 1.5 BTC on the first deposit in cryptocurrency and throws in 100 free spins. The next three deposits are worth 100%, 50% and 25%.
Activate the 100 free spinsThe list is an archive of addresses, not an archive of operators. It contains domains, not companies; and a new domain is registered in a few minutes, while being added to the list comes afterwards, with the periodic updates published by the Agency.
Between the two speeds there is a window, and it is the reason why the same brand can turn out absent today and present at the next check without anything substantial having changed at the operator.
This also explains why absence from the list is never a quality of the casino. It is a photograph of the state of a list on a precise day, which is why next to every count on this site there is the date of the check.
The other multiplication: nine numbers for twenty-four brands
On the licence side the multiplication goes the other way. Of the hundred brands in the library, 68 publish a licence number, but the distinct numbers are 53: nine registrations, on their own, cover 24 brands.
The most extensive case is the Anjouan registration ALSI-202508056-FI2, reported by five different brands: Oshi Casino, PlayAmo, Slotum, Winz.io and Bitkingz. One registration, one company, one expiry date — and five sites with different names, graphics and promises.
The two tables on this page touch at three points. Winz.io is among the brands with back-up domains and among the five on the shared registration. Mirax is among the brands with back-up domains and shares with 7Bit Casino and KatsuBet the Curaçao number OGL/2024/1307/0748. Casinoly is among the brands with back-up domains and sits on OGL/2023/103/0067, which in the register turns out to be revoked and which it shares with Betriot and Zet Casino.
Three brands out of eight, that is, change address and at the same time share their registration with somebody else.
Why changing domain also complicates checking the number
The certificates portal of the Curaçao authority is indexed by the operator’s domain: the search starts from the site’s address, not from the company’s name. It is a convenient choice as long as the address stays the same.
When the brand moves to a new address, the certificate that was found starting from the old address does not transfer by itself. The check has to be redone on the new domain, and it is a different check, not confirmation of the one already made.
The public register of Anjouan follows a different logic, because it shows number, company, status and the expiry date as well; but it still starts from the number, and the number is published by the operator on the page that is changing.
What to do when comparing several brands
Three checks, in this order. The first: check whether the declared licence number also appears on other brands, because in nine cases out of fifty-three it does. The second: look for the company named in the register, not the trade name, because it is the company that has an expiry date. The third: note the date on which you looked, because both the status of the licence and membership of a list change without notice.
Anyone who wants to start from the other end — that is, from those who really do hold the Italian concession — will find the route in the page on the ADM concession. The moment at which the operator, whatever its address, asks for documents is described in the page on registration and tax code.
What has not been reconstructed
It has not been established who controls the companies named in the registers, nor whether different brands with different registrations belong to the same group: the library records the holder of the licence, not the corporate structure above it.
For the 24 back-up domains their presence on the list was checked, not their activity: some may never have been in operation.